(Psst: The FTC wants me to remind you that this website contains affiliate links. That means if you make a purchase from a link you click on, I might receive a small commission. This does not increase the price you’ll pay for that item nor does it decrease the awesomeness of the item. ~ Daisy)
Author of The Widow in the Woods
Mark Zuckerberg sent a bombshell letter to Congress proving yet another of our silly little conspiracy theories right. He admitted that the Biden/Harris administration had asked his company to censor posts about the Hunter Biden laptop and Covid-19.
In a letter addressed to House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, Zuckerberg explained.
He told Jordan that in 2021, “senior officials” from the Biden administration and White House “repeatedly pressured our teams for months to censor certain COVID-19 content, including humor and satire.”
When Facebook did not agree with the censorship, Zuckerberg said, the Biden administration expressed a lot of frustration.
“Ultimately, it was our decision whether or not to take content down, and we own our decisions, including COVID-19-related changes we made to our enforcement in the wake of this pressure,” Zuckerberg wrote. “I believe the government pressure was wrong, and I regret that we were not more outspoken about it. (source)
But it wasn’t only information about Covid that they covered up. Hunter Biden’s laptop story could have changed the outcome of the last election, and mentions of this, too, were erased from Facebook and Instagram.
Zuckerberg also said that Facebook shouldn’t have censored the NY Post‘s Hunter Biden laptop story – and said that the FBI had warned the platform “about a potential Russian disinformation operation about the Biden family and Burisma in the lead up to the 2020 election.”
“That fall, when we saw a New York Post story reporting on corruption allegations involving then-Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden’s family, we sent that story to fact-checkers for review and temporarily demoted it while waiting for a reply,” reads the letter. “It’s since been made clear that the reporting was not Russian disinformation, and in retrospect, we shouldn’t have demoted the story.” (source)
Why does this matter?
Some of you are thinking, “I don’t use Facebook or Instagram. Why should I care?”
As I’ve written before, the level of influence here is utterly massive.
Consider the fact that the “population” of Facebook is bigger than the populations of the US, China, and Brazil combined.
That’s how many people will now only receive one side of the story on things like war, politics, guns, and current events. People will believe what they’re told because there is no alternative information presented. There are no questions asked. It’s literally the textbook definition of brainwashing.
Social media is a massive source of information and influence today. If the information is rigged by entities that support socialism, gun control, and the end of privacy, we’re doomed. 2.2 billion active users will be bombarded with these messages without any real option for the other side of the story.
So regardless of whether you, personally, participate, this will color popular sentiment to a massive degree. It will grow the cognitive dissonance that assures people of things like “the government is your friend” and that “you don’t need to protect yourself, the police will take care of you.”
People who hate freedom will get unfettered access to the minds of 2 billion people. That should scare the crap out of you.
This isn’t the first illicit action that Facebook has taken to hide information.
In 2018, there was a coordinated social media purge that deleted hundreds of alternative news accounts from both Facebook and Twitter. These small websites, just working to share opinions and facts that differed from what the MSM shared, had their lifes’ work completely eradicated. They lost everything they had built and many sites shut down completely at that time.
At the time, President Trump was in office but that doesn’t mean that his administration was responsible for the actions. In fact, this did more to hurt Trump than help him, because any positive coverage of him was also lost in the algorithm. Many of the websites erased supported (or at least didn’t despise) Trump.
It’s specifically the Biden/Harris administration that Zuckerberg is pointing the finger at here. And we knew it the whole time and we screamed it from the rooftops and anyone who believed the MSM was convinced we were all crazy.
This is some real Chinese firewall BS we have had going on in America. But hey, vote for Shiny New Kamala Harris and “save democracy.”
Here’s Zuckerberg’s letter.
This is an attack on the First Amendment.
Another argument at the time all this was happening was that this was not a First Amendment issue. Detractors said that Facebook was a private company and could do whatever they liked. They said if we didn’t like it, we didn’t have to use it.
And that’s true, if it had been a decision within Facebook without government influence.
But the fact is, the government was responsible for this. 100{ebf8267f808eac43d24742043db51eeeb004db6334271e1bb6fe8c21c7925753}. The person that they are currently trying to elect to office was part of the administration who pressured a large company to do it’s bidding and hide facts and opinions that were contrary to their interests.
Two.
Billion.
People.
That’s one heck of a captive audience.
Why is Zuckerberg admitting this now?
It’s difficult to say why Mark Zuckerberg chose this time to come clean. But part of me has to wonder if he knows something about the outcome of the upcoming election the rest of us don’t.
Perhaps he is convinced that Trump will be re-elected and he doesn’t want to be in trouble later for his part in the matter. Maybe he has become a Trump fan – he expressed how impressed he was with Trump’s response when he was shot.
Maybe he sees the writing on the wall and he doesn’t want to face an angry mob with virtual pitchforks.
What are your thoughts?
Were you surprised by this admission? Did you believe at the time that the government was behind the wave of censorship? How influential do you think social media is?
Let’s discuss it in the comments section.
About Daisy
Daisy Luther is a coffee-swigging, adventure-seeking, globe-trotting blogger. She is the founder and publisher of three websites. 1) The Organic Prepper, which is about current events, preparedness, self-reliance, and the pursuit of liberty; 2) The Frugalite, a website with thrifty tips and solutions to help people get a handle on their personal finances without feeling deprived; and 3) PreppersDailyNews.com, an aggregate site where you can find links to all the most important news for those who wish to be prepared. Her work is widely republished across alternative media and she has appeared in many interviews.
Daisy is the best-selling author of 5 traditionally published books, 12 self-published books, and runs a small digital publishing company with PDF guides, printables, and courses at SelfRelianceand Survival.com You can find her on Facebook, Pinterest, Gab, MeWe, Parler, Instagram, and Twitter.
