Can Qualified Immunity Protect an Officer’s Use of Force in Oklahoma City? An Oklahoma City police officer was caught on video hurling an elderly Asian man to the street, resulting in serious head injuries after the man lightly struck the officer on the chest. The question is: Can this police use of force be excused under qualified immunity? Let’s break it down.
FREE Law of Self Defense HARD TO CONVICT Class!
Join us for our 100% FREE Law of Self Defense HARD TO CONVICT class coming up in just a few weeks.
As the title suggests this free webinar teaches you how to be HARD TO CONVICT if you’re ever compelled to use force in defense of yourself, your family, or your property.
The webinar is live streamed by me, and there’s plenty of opportunity for Q&A, as well. Again, the Law of Self Defense HARD TO CONVICT class is 100% free, but we do limit seats to allow for adequate Q&A with attendee, so I urge you to grab YOUR seat right NOW by clicking the image or link below:
Law of Self Defense HARD TO CONVICT Class
Disclaimer – Content is for educational & entertainment purposes only, and does not constitute legal advice. If you are in need of legal advice you must retain competent legal counsel in the relevant jurisdiction.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
ANALYSIS
The Incident
Elderly Vietnamese driver Lick Vu was involved in a minor fender bender caused by an illegal driving maneuver. The responding police officer cited the other driver for an expired registration tag and sent her on her way. Meanwhile, Vu was issued a ticket for his illegal action. However, Vu became argumentative, insisting that he was not at fault and that the other driver should be held responsible.
Throughout the interaction, it was clear Vu had a limited grasp of English, which, combined with his advanced age, may have contributed to the miscommunication. Both Vu and the officer became visibly irritated. At one point, Vu struck the officer’s chest with his hand in what could be described as offensive but not threatening. Following this, the officer decided to arrest Vu, grabbing him by the arm to initiate the process.
The arrest escalated quickly. Moments later, Vu was on the ground, unconscious and handcuffed. His wife, who spoke slightly better English, pleaded for an ambulance. The officer agreed to call one.
Conflicting Accounts
The officer claimed that Vu simply fell to the ground during the arrest and that he followed him down. This narrative, initially supported by the officer’s body-worn camera, seemed plausible. However, surveillance footage from a nearby camera told a starkly different story, showing the officer forcefully spinning Vu to the ground with excessive violence.
Use of Force Analysis
Police are allowed to use reasonable force to compel compliance with a lawful arrest. However, this force must be the minimum necessary under the circumstances. The surveillance footage clearly shows that the force used on Vu, a frail elderly man, was grossly excessive.
This raises significant concerns:
Vu’s age and frailty were apparent and should have informed the officer’s actions.
The level of force used far exceeded what was necessary to secure compliance.
The officer’s claim that Vu simply fell is directly contradicted by the surveillance video.
Vu suffered life-threatening injuries, including bleeding on the brain, and photos from his hospital stay underscore the severity of his condition.
Qualified Immunity: Does It Apply Here?
Qualified immunity is often misunderstood. It does not protect officers from criminal liability, only civil liability. In this case, if the officer’s actions are deemed criminal, qualified immunity would offer no protection.
Qualified immunity exists to protect officers from personal lawsuits when they act within the scope of their duties. If their actions are reasonable and lawful, the officer is shielded from civil liability, and the department assumes responsibility for any damages. However, if the officer’s actions are excessive and fall outside the scope of their duties, qualified immunity does not apply.
Why Qualified Immunity Matters
Police officers, by nature of their job, regularly use force to uphold the law. Without qualified immunity, officers would face thousands of potential lawsuits annually for even the slightest use of force, making it financially and practically impossible for them to do their jobs. However, the doctrine does not provide blanket protection. It is applied only when the officer’s actions are lawful and within the scope of their responsibilities.
What Happens Next?
In this case, the officer’s violent actions appear to fall outside the protections of qualified immunity. The surveillance footage makes it evident that the force was excessive and unnecessary. The officer is likely to face both civil liability and criminal prosecution for his actions.
Vu, on the other hand, could pursue damages from the Oklahoma City Police Department, which is better positioned to handle such lawsuits.
Final Thoughts
This case underscores the importance of understanding qualified immunity as a legal doctrine. While it protects officers acting within the law, it does not excuse abuse of power or excessive force.
